This session was part of a half-day workshop hosted by FSU’s Office of Research Development. This digital occasion offered college with info crucial to the National Science Foundation CAREER submission in addition to the chance to listen to from previous reviewers and awardees.
S H O W N O T E S
0:54 – Introduction of Reviewers (In Order of Appearance)
Theodore Baker: baker@cs.fsu.edu
Biwu Ma: bma@fsu.edu
Sachin Shanbhag: sshanbhag@fsu.edu
3:21 – What are among the frequent denominators of profitable proposals seen?
10:15 – What are among the largest errors/missteps that might result in a rejection?
27:22 – What is the prospect of an NSF Proposal being accepted with out having preliminary information or outcomes?
30:48 – How ought to an applicant display potential for future works primarily based on what they’ve already accomplished? How ought to an applicant distinguish what I’ve accomplished and my future work?
36:31 – Should an applicant describe how they will consider the success of all of the proposal actions, analysis, and academic outreach of their venture?
44:10 – Should the evaluation be quantitative for some actions because it’s tough to quantitatively consider the success for some actions?
45:37 – If you possibly can give one piece of recommendation that’s important, what would that be?
The Office of Research Development is ready to assessment proposals and supply suggestions if sufficient time is given. ORD additionally has Research Mentoring periods for these .
Mentoring Resources: https://www.research.fsu.edu/research-offices/ord/research-mentoring/
Panelists: Drs. Ted Baker, Biwu Ma, and Sachin Shanbhag
Hosted by Beth Hodges, Director of the Office of Research Development
Edited by Evangeline Ciupek, Office of Research Development
Music: “Interplanetary Forest” by Meydn*
For extra analysis growth providers and sources, please go to ord.fsu.edu.
* Attribution licensing. License: Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)
source
